4.1 Review

Review of the magnitude of folate and vitamin B12 deficiencies worldwide

期刊

FOOD AND NUTRITION BULLETIN
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 S38-S51

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15648265080292S107

关键词

folate deficiency; folic acid; homocysteine; methylmalonic acid; vitamin B-12 deficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human deficiencies of folate and vitamin B-12 result in adverse effects which may be of public health significance, but the magnitude of these deficiencies is unknown. Therefore, we examine the prevalence data currently available, assess global coverage of surveys, determine the frequency with which vitamin status assessment methods are used, and identify patterns of status related to geographical distribution and human development. Surveys were identified through PubMed and the Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System at the World Health Organization (WHO). Since different thresholds were frequently used to define deficiency, measures of central tendency were used to compare blood vitamin concentrations among countries. The percentage of countries with at least one survey is highest in the WHO Regions of South-East Asia and Europe. Folate and vitamin B-12 status were most frequently assessed in women of reproductive age (34 countries), and in all adults (27 countries), respectively. Folate status assessment surveys assessed plasma or serum concentrations (55%), erythrocyte folate concentrations (21 %), or both (23%). Homocysteine was assessed in one-third of the surveys of folate and vitamin B-12 status (31 % and 34 % respectively), while methylmalonic acid was assessed in fewer surveys of vitamin B-12 status (13%). No relationship between vitamin concentrations and geographical distribution, level of development, or population groups could be identified, but nationally representative data were few. More representative data and more consistent use of thresholds to define deficiency are needed in order to assess whether folate and vitamin B-12 deficiencies are a public health problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据