4.7 Article

Nutrients and non-nutrients composition and bioactivity of wild and cultivated Coprinus comatus (OFMull.) Pers.

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 289-296

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.017

关键词

Coprinus comatus; Edible mushroom; Nutrients/non-nutrients; Antioxidant activity; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal)
  2. COMPETE/QREN/EU [PTDC/AGR-ALI/110062/2009, BPD/4609/2008]
  3. CIMO [PEst-OE/AGR/UI0690/2011]
  4. Serbian Ministry of Education and Science [173032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mushrooms have been reported as sources of biomolecules with various potential. Coprinus comatus was studied to obtain information about this species, comparing cultivated and wild samples. Free sugars, fatty acids, tocopherols, organic acids and phenolic acids were analyzed by chromatographic techniques coupled to different detectors. C. comatus methanolic extract was tested for its antioxidant potential (reducing power, radical scavenging activity and lipid peroxidation inhibition) and antimicrobial properties (tested towards Gram positive and negative bacteria, and microfungi). The toxicity for liver cells was tested in porcine liver primary cells. Both studied samples revealed similar nutritional value and energy contribution. The cultivated sample revealed the highest content in free sugars, monounsaturated fatty acids and tocopherols, while the wild mushroom was richer in saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, organic acids and phenolic compounds. The cultivated species also revealed the highest antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity (with exception towards Gram negative bacteria and Aspergillus ochraceus). Both species revealed no toxicity towards porcine liver cells. The present study proved that cultivated and wild mushrooms from the same species could be excellent options as food and as sources of nutritional and bioactive compounds. Furthermore, differences in wild and cultivated samples were comparatively investigated for the first time. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据