4.7 Article

Hydroxyl radical induced by lipid in Maillard reaction model system promotes diet-derived Nε-carboxymethyllysine formation

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 536-541

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.081

关键词

Advanced glycation end products; Carboxymethyllysine; Hydroxyl radical; Lipid

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB720800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130042, 31371833, 31271885]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT [2011ZZ0084]
  4. [NCET-10-0395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-epsilon-carboxymethyllysine (CML) is commonly found in food, and is considered as a potential hazard to human health. However, the effect of lipids on CML formation in Maillard reaction is still not clarified. In this study, the content of diet-derived CML and its key intermediates, epsilon-fructoselysine (FL) and glyoxal (GO), is determined with high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrum (HPLC-MS) in model system containing lipid compounds. According to the results, hydroxyl radical (OH center dot) induced by Fenton reagent can promote the three pathways of CML formation. Moreover, in the Maillard reaction system, linoleic acid (Lin), oleic acid (Ole) and glycerol trioleate (Tr) can induce more OH center dot, which promotes CML formation. Their level of promoting CML formation is in the order of Ole > Lin > Tri. On the contrary, glycerol (Gly) can scavenge OH center dot, which inhibit the CML formation. Finally, it is proved that FL content and GO content decreases with heating time in model system, while CML content increases with heating time. Thus, it is concluded that in the Maillard reaction system lipids can induce more OH center dot, which promotes the conversion from FL and GO to CML. Our research may contribute to the development of inhibitory methods for diet-derived CML by scavenging OH center dot. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据