4.7 Article

DNA damage in organs of mice treated acutely with patulin, a known mycotoxin

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 3548-3555

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.022

关键词

Mycotoxin; Patulin; Genotoxicity; Oxidative damage; Comet assay

资金

  1. Brazilian Agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento e Formacao de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. GENOTOX - Royal Institute, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patulin, a known mycotoxin, is considered a significant contaminant in apples, apple-derived products and feeds. This study investigated the genotoxic effects of patulin in multiple organs (brain, kidney, liver and urinary bladder) of mice using an in vivo comet assay. We assessed the mechanism underlying this genotoxicity by measuring the GSH content and the thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) level. Male CF-1 mice were given 1.0-3.75 mg/kg patulin intraperitoneally. The effect of patulin was dose-dependent and the highest patulin dose induced DNA strand breaks in the brain (damage index, DI, in hippocampus increased from 36.2 in control animals to 127.5), liver (44.3-138.4) and kidneys (31.5-99); decreased levels of GSH (hippocampus - from 46.9 to 18.4 nmol/mg protein); and an increase in lipid peroxidation (hippocampus - from 5.8 to 20.3 MDA equivalents/mg protein). This finding establishes an interrelationship between the pro-oxidant and genotoxic effects of patulin. Pre-treatment administration of N-acetyl-cysteine reduced patulin-induced DNA damage (hippocampus - DI from 127.5 to 39.8) and lipid peroxidation (hippocampus -20.3 to 12.8 MDA equivalents/mg protein) by restoring cellular GSH levels, reinforcing the positive relationship between patulin-induced GSH depletion and DNA damage caused by systemic administration of this mycotoxin. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据