4.7 Article

Chemical and cellular antioxidant activity of two novel peptides designed based on glutathione structure

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 4085-4091

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.028

关键词

Glutathione; Tripeptide (Glu-Cys-His); Tetrapeptide (Tyr-Glu-Cys-Gly); Antioxidant activity; PC12 cell model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171783, 31101222, 31000759]
  2. Key Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province [2011A080403019]
  3. Research Cooperation Project of Guangdong Province
  4. Ministry of Education [2011A090200078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel peptides, ECH (Glu-Cys-His) and YECG (Tyr-Glu-Cys-Gly), were designed based on glutathione (Glu-Cys-Gly, GSH) and their antioxidant activities were studied. Various chemical methods based on single-electron-transfer (SET) and hydrogen-atom-transfer (HAT) were applied to evaluate the antioxidant activities of the peptides. For SET-based assay, tripeptide ECH displayed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity (80.16%) and the strongest reducing power (A(700) = 0.378). Besides, ECH also exhibited the best inhibition activity toward linoleic acid peroxidation with inhibition rate 98.25% at 7th day, which is a HAT-based assay. However, for another two HAT-based assays, it was tetrapeptide YECG that showed extraordinary oxygen radical absorption capacity (ORAC value = 2.42 mu M Trolox/mu M) and ABTS free radical scavenging ability (8.88 mM Trolox/mM). In vitro cultured PC12 cell model also suggested that YECG gave the best protection for PC12 cells to resist H2O2-treated necrosis. It was found that the discrepancy of antioxidant capacity between ECH and YECG was caused by the presence of antioxidant amino acids (His/Tyr) and their position in peptide chain. With His located at C-terminal position. ECH demonstrated good electrons donating capacity, while with Tyr at N-terminal position, YECG exhibited strong oxygen radical absorbance capacity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据