4.7 Article

β-ODAP accumulation could be related to low levels of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in Lathyrus sativus L.

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 556-562

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.054

关键词

Grass pea; H2O2; O-2(center dot-); beta-ODAP; Oxidative stress; Rhizobium

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30625025]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu province, PR China [0803RJZA034]
  3. Programs for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Level of the neuroexcitatory beta-N-oxalyl-L-alpha,beta-diaminopropionic acid (beta-ODAP) in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L) varies with development and environmental stress. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) (mainly O-2(center dot-) and H2O2) are frequently reported to play important roles in plant development and in response to various stresses. To investigate the possible inter-relationship between contents of beta-ODAP and ROS, grass pea leaves have been analyzed for contents of beta-ODAP, O-2(center dot-) and H2O2. The results showed that leaves containing high levels of beta-ODAP, exhibited low levels of O-2(center dot-) and H2O2, while leaves with high contents of O-2(center dot-) and H2O2 accumulated little beta-ODAP. The application of pyridine or ABA which inhibit the production of O-2(center dot-) or H2O2 led to an increase in beta-ODAP contents in intact or detached young leaves, whereas inhibition of catalase activity using AT (3-amino-1,2,4-triazole), leading to an increase in H2O2 content, result in significant decrease in beta-ODAP levels of detached young leaves. In addition, inoculation of Rhizobium to young seedlings enhanced O-2(center dot-) and H2O2 levels, but reduced beta-ODAP contents in shoots. These results suggest that beta-ODAP accumulation could be related to low levels of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in grass pea tissues. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据