4.7 Article

Evaluation of developmental toxicity of microbicide Nisin in rats

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 598-603

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.006

关键词

rats; teratology; developmental toxicity; pregnant; Nisin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we have investigated the developmental toxicity of a naturally occurring peptide, Nisin in rats in order to determine its suitability as a safe vaginal microbicide. Our earlier studies indicated that, Nisin is a dual function microbicide having contraceptive and antibacterial activities. However, as part of the safety evaluation of any vaginal microbicide, it is essential to deter-mine its teratogenic potential in a suitable animal model before it is found suitable to enter clinical trials. Sixty pregnant rats allocated into four groups were orally administered with 10, 25 and 50 mg Nisin/kg/day from day 6 to day 15 of gestation. Individual food/water consumption and body weight changes were measured daily. Nisin did not cause maternal mortality nor did the treated animals show any clinical signs of toxicity when compared to the control animals. There were no biologically significant differences in maternal liver, kidney, thymus, ovary, gravid and empty uterine weights. Mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites also did not differ in the treated groups when compared to their respective controls. All the fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined carefully for externally visible malformations. No gross external fetal alterations were observed at any dose tested. When stained by the double staining method, no skeletal malformations and visceral defects were observed in the fetuses. The growth and reproductive performance of the F-1 progeny was also unaffected. In conclusion, Nisin shows unique clinical potential as a safe prophylactic microbicide to curb the transmission of STIs/HIV and unintended pregnancies. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据