4.5 Article

Physicochemical property changes of cabbage outer leaves upon preparation into functional dietary fiber powder

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
卷 90, 期 C3, 页码 541-548

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2011.09.001

关键词

Anticarcinogenic substance; Blanching; Color; Drying; Glucosinolates

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF), through its Royal Golden Jubilee (RGJ) Ph.D. Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White cabbages (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) are important sources of dietary fiber (DF) and glucosinolates, which are claimed to possess anticarcinogenic activity. Although the potential use of cabbage outer leaves as starting raw materials to produce functional dietary fiber powder (DFP) has been reported, the effects of various processing steps that are necessary to produce the powder have not been systematically investigated. To allow minimization of losses of glucosinolates during production of DFP the effects of processing steps, i.e., slicing, blanching and drying, on the changes of total glucosinoltates in cabbage outer leaves were investigated; the changes of DFP compositions and color were also investigated. It was noted that the preparation steps did not lead to any significant changes of the DFP compositions. On the other hand, steam blanching was noted to better preserve glucosinolates than water blanching. Drying methods and conditions did not lead to any significant effect on the DFP compositions; however vacuum drying led to better retention of glucosinolates. Color of the DFP was not affected by the drying methods and conditions. The results suggested that cabbage outer leaves should be prepared into DFP by steam blanching prior to slicing in combination with vacuum drying at 80 degrees C. (C) 2011 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据