4.5 Article

Enzymatic production of Xylooligosaccharide from selected agricultural wastes

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
卷 87, 期 C2, 页码 145-151

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2008.09.002

关键词

Xylooligosaccharides; Tobacco stalks; Cotton stalks; Sunflower stalks; Wheat straw

资金

  1. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four different agricultural wastes, namely tobacco stalk (TS), cotton stalk (CS), sunflower stalk (SS) and wheat straw (WS) were tested for the production of Xylooligosaccharide (XO). XO production was performed by enzymatic hydrolysis of xylans which were obtained by alkali extraction from the agricultural wastes. Depending on the source, it was found that these four agricultural wastes contained different amount of xylan, cellulose and lignin and the xylan obtained from these source contained different amount of sugar and uronic acid. The highest amount of arabinose was in xylan from WS while the other xylans mainly had xylose and small amount of glucose. Different xylanase preparations were evaluated for production XO from these xylan sources. Aspergillus niger xylanase produced lower amount of XO from wheat straw xylan (WSX) than cotton stalk xylan (CSX), sun flower xylan (SSX) and tobacco stalk xylan (TSX) while Trichoderma longibrachiatum xylanase hydrolyzed highly branched WSX better. The HPLC analysis of the hydrolysis products indicated that depending on structure and composition of xylan, A. niger xylanase produced less amount of xylose than I longibrachiatum xylanase, and the hyrolysis product of A. niger xylanase contained different amount of oligosaccharides (X2 > X3 > X4 > X5 > X6, >X6). Regardless of the structural differences of the xylan types presented in this paper, all xylans generated XO with different degree of polymerization (DP), but the DP of XO depended on the enzyme specificity and the structure of substrate. (C) 2008 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据