4.7 Article

Optimization of Aspergillus niger Fermentation for the Production of Glucose Oxidase

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 344-352

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-007-0050-x

关键词

Glucose oxidase; Aspergillus niger; Plackett-Burman design; Response surface methodology; Central composite design

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of nutritional factors influencing glucose oxidase (EC 1.1.3.4) production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 545 were studied. The synthesis of glucose oxidase by A. niger was investigated in two steps using submerged fermentation at 30 +/- 2 A degrees C and 180 rpm for 96 h. Primarily, nutritional components were selected by one-factor-at-a-time method, and the significance of each component with respect to glucose oxidase production was identified by Plackett-Burman design (seven variables including six nutritional viz. sucrose, sodium nitrate, peptone, calcium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and one dummy or unassigned variable were studied with eight experiments). In the second step, concentration of most significant factors and their interaction were studied with response surface methodology (central composite design). Each variable in the design was studied at five different levels, with all variables taken at a central coded value of zero. Considerable amount of glucose oxidase was produced from A. niger species with sucrose as the carbon source, sodium nitrate as the inorganic nitrogen source, and peptone as the organic nitrogen source. Glucose oxidase activity increased remarkably by 28.93 fold (from 0.00993 to 0.29 U ml(-1)) with CaCO3-supplemented media. The outcome of Plackett-Burman design showed CaCO3, peptone, and MgSO4 as significant parameters. Further optimization using a three-factor central composite design with 20 experiments increased yield of glucose oxidase from 0.29 to 2.05 U ml(-1) (sevenfold) with a decrease in cultivation time from 96 to 72 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据