4.4 Article

Dispersive Micro Solid-Phase Extraction with Graphene Oxide for the Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Dietary Supplements by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 833-840

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-014-9959-7

关键词

Danshen; Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction; Graphite oxide; Phenolic compounds; Quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry; Ultra high performance liquid chromatography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81274065]
  2. Research on Public Welfare Technology Application Projects of Zhejiang Province [2014C37069]
  3. Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Chinese University [IRT 1231]
  4. Hangzhou [2013-45]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Hangzhou Normal University [2011QDL33]
  6. new-shoot Talents Program of Zhejiang province [2013R421044, 2014R421019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report described the use of graphite oxide (GO) as sorbent in dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (DMSPE), together with ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS), for the determination of phenolic compounds (protocatechuic aldehyde, caffeic acid, and rosmarinic acid) in dietary supplements. The extraction conditions such as sample agitation, agitation time, sorbent amount, and type and volume of the eluent were optimized. The results showed that GO-assisted DMSPE exhibited higher enrichment factors for tested solutes as compared to the normal extraction. Under the most favorable conditions, good limits of detection (0.07-0.21 ng/mL) and repeatability of extraction (RSDs below 5.6 %, n = 5) were obtained. The developed method was applied to determine phenolic analytes with satisfactory recoveries, which were 90.1-96.4 % for Danshen and 85.5-97.6 % for Danshen injection, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据