4.4 Article

UV-Visible Spectroscopy and Multivariate Classification as a Screening Tool to Identify Adulteration of Culinary Spices with Sudan I and Blends of Sudan I plus IV Dyes

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 1090-1096

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-013-9717-2

关键词

Sudan dyes; UV-visible spectroscopy; Multivariate analysis; Screening methods; Food adulteration

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas (CONICET)
  2. SeCyT-Universidad Nacional del Sur
  3. FIA Laboratory of the Analytical Department (INQUISUR-UNS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work propose a feasible, rapid, and simple method for detecting culinary spices adulterated either with Sudan I dye or blends of Sudan I + IV dyes at three concentration levels. The method is based on the use of UV-visible spectroscopy with multivariate analysis. Four types of spices were studied: three paprika varieties (mild, hot, and smoked) and a spice commonly consumed in Argentina called aji molido. Principal components analysis was firstly applied as an exploratory analysis and then, two classification techniques were used: K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Three classes were defined: unadulterated samples and adulterated samples with Sudan I or blends of Sudan I + IV dyes at 1, 2.5, and 5 ppm (mg L-1). Classification techniques gave satisfactory results: between 89 and 100 % for PLS-DA and between 83 and 92 % for KNN. The sensitivity and specificity of the models were above 83 %. It has to be highlighted that none of the adulterated samples were assigned as unadulterated, which is very positive because of the implication that these results have on consumer health. The capability of detecting mixtures of Sudan dyes is a very important advantage because each Sudan dye generates different hazardous metabolites in human body so their toxicity may be enhanced by the simultaneous presence of such dyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据