4.4 Article

Simultaneous and Fast Determination of Malachite Green, Leucomalachite Green, Crystal Violet, and Brilliant Green in Seafood by Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 406-414

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-012-9456-9

关键词

Dye residues; Seafood; Sample throughput; QuEChERS; UHPLC-MS/MS

资金

  1. Research Group Analytical Chemistry of Contaminants, University of Almeria
  2. Juan de la Cierva Program (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and Innovation-European Social Fund, MINECO-ESF)
  3. Ramon y Cajal Program (MINECO-ESF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new procedure has been developed for the simultaneous analysis of malachite green (MG), leucomalachite green (LMG), crystal violet (CV), and brilliant green (BG) in seafood using a modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) procedure and subsequent determination by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in < 5.5 min. The developed method was validated at 2, 10, 25, and 100 mu g kg(-1), obtaining recoveries in the range of 48-112 %, with repeatability and interday precision values (expressed as relative standard deviation) a parts per thousand currency sign17 and a parts per thousand currency sign24 %, respectively. Matrix effect was evaluated for different types of seafood (shrimp, salmon, and trout), indicating that shrimp can be chosen as representative matrix for the determination of the selected dyes, except for LMG. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were < 0.5 mu g kg(-1), which were always below the minimum required performance limits established by the European Union. The decision limit (CC alpha) and detection capability (CC beta) values were also estimated in the three matrices evaluated, and CC beta ranged from 0.46 to 1.22 mu g kg(-1). Finally, several types of seafood were analyzed, and some dye residues (MG, CV and BG) were detected in a salmon sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据