4.4 Article

Detection of maduramycin residues in the tissues of chickens and pheasants by the screening test for antibiotic residues (STAR)

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.561879

关键词

microbial screening; veterinary drug residues; antibiotics; animal products; meat

资金

  1. VEGA [1/0403/08, 1/0658/09, 1/0144/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maduramycin is a coccidiostat authorized as a feed additive in poultry. Council Directive 96/23/EC stipulates that monitoring of foods of animal origin for residues of coccidiostats is mandatory. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the STAR for the screening of maduramycin residues in the tissues of broiler chickens and pheasants. Both animal species were supplied feed medicated with Cygro l% premix according to recommendations for use (5 mg kg-1 of complete feed). The residues were investigated for a period of 7 days: day 0 (the last day of the administration of maduramycin), days 1-5 (the days of the withdrawal period) and day 6 (the first day after elapse of the withdrawal period). According to STAR the positivity of the sample (the presence of residues of antibacterial substances) is indicated by a zone of inhibition exceeding 2 or 4 mm in width, depending on the test organism. Maduramycin residues were detected only on the plates seeded with the test organism Bacillus stearothermophilus var. calidolactis ATCC 10149. The results showed that there was higher potential for the presence of maduramycin residues in broiler chickens than in pheasants. All chicken tissues (muscle/thigh and breast/gizzard, liver, heart, kidneys, spleen, lungs) were positive for maduramycin (inhibition zones epsilon 4 mm) not only throughout the withdrawal period, but also even 5 days after elapse of the withdrawal period. In the case of pheasants the positive results were detected in the gizzard, liver, heart, kidneys, spleen and lungs. On day 5 of the withdrawal period no positive results were detected; however, on day 6 the heart and spleen were positive again.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据