4.0 Article

Transgenic tools for members of the genus Drosophila with sequenced genomes

期刊

FLY
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 349-362

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/fly.4.4.13304

关键词

Drosophila; piggyBac; transposon mutagenesis; mini-white; GAL4/UAS

资金

  1. Indiana Genomics Initiative INGEN
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21380041] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sequencing of the genomes of 12 Drosophila species has created an opportunity for much in the way of comparative molecular analyses amongst these species. To aid that endeavor, we have made several transformation vectors based on the piggyBac transposon with 3x P3-EGFP and -ECFP transgenic markers that should be useful for mutagenesis and establishing the GAL4/UAS system in these species. We have tested the ability of mini-white to be used as a marker for insertional mutagenesis, and have observed mini-white-derived pigmentation of the testes sheath in a subset of lines from D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis. We have incorporated a source of piggyBac transposase into nine Drosophila species, and have demonstrated the functionality of these transposase lines for mobilization of marked inserts in vivo. Additionally, we tested the ability of a D. melanogaster nanos enhancer element to drive expression of GAL4 in D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. erecta, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis. The efficacy of the nos-Gal4 transgene was determined by measuring the response of UAS-EGFPtub in all six species. Our results show that D. melanogaster nos-Gal4 drives expression in other species, to varying degrees, in similar spatiotemporal domains in the ovaries, testes and embryos as seen in D. melanogaster. However, expression levels are variable, demonstrating the possible need to use species-specific promoters in some cases. In summary, we hope to provide a set of guidelines and basic tools, based upon this work, for both insertional mutagenesis and GAL4/UAS system-based experiments in multiple species of Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据