4.5 Article

Vitamin D and cognitive function: The Tromso Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 355, 期 1-2, 页码 155-161

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.009

关键词

Cognition; Mendelian randomization; Polymorphisms; Prospective study; Vitamin D receptor; Vitamin D

资金

  1. North Norway Regional Health Authority [151031/15082]
  2. Norwegian Research Council [213787/F20]
  3. UiT The Arctic University of Norway [311322 225109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: There are indications that vitamin D may be important for more than skeletal health, including cognitive function. Methods: The study was performed in Tromso, Northern Norway (The Tromso Study). In a cross-sectional study serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was measured and cognitive function (word recall, digit-symbol coding, finger tapping, Mini Mental State Examination) tested in 4624 subjects; in a prospective study serum 25(OH)D was measured in samples from 1994 and compared to cognitive function tested in 3436 subjects in 2001 and 2044 subjects in 2007; and in a Mendelian randomization study single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to vitamin D were evaluated versus cognitive function in 5980 subjects. Results: In the cross-sectional study all tests were positively associated with serum 25(OH)D levels with similar to 5% better performance in subjects in the highest versus lowest serum 25(OH)D quartile. This relation was only seen in subjects older than 65 years. After full adjustment for season, age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, physical activity and education, the relation was only significant for finger tapping. In the prospective study, serum 25(OH)D from 1994 similarly predicted cognitive function 7-13 years later. In the Mendelian randomization study, only one SNP in the VDR gene (Apal, rs7975232) was significantly associated with cognition (word recall and digit-symbol coding). Conclusions: There is an association between serum 25(OH)D and cognition, but randomized controlled trials are needed to establish causality. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights resented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据