4.5 Review

The natural history of brain volume loss among patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 357, 期 1-2, 页码 8-18

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.014

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Systematic literature review; Meta-analysis; Brain volume loss; Disease progression; Atrophy; Disease-modifying treatment

资金

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Multiple sclerosis has been associated with progressive brain volume loss. Objective: We aimed to systematically summarize reported rates of brain volume loss in multiple sclerosis and explore associations between brain volume loss and markers of disease severity. Methods: A systematic literature search (2003-2013) was conducted to identify studies with >= 12 months of follow-up, reported brain volume measurement algorithms, and changes in brain volume. Meta-analysis random-effects models were applied. Associations between brain volume change, changes in lesion volume and disease duration were examined in pre-specified meta-regression models. Results: We identified 38 studies. For the meta-analysis, 12 studies that reported annualized percentage brain volume change (PBVC), specified first-generation disease-modifying treatments (e.g., interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate) and used Structural Image Evaluation of Normalized Atrophy algorithm were analyzed. The annualized PBVC ranged from -1.34% to -0.46% per year. The pooled PBVC was -0.69% (95% CI = -0.87% to -0.50%) in study arms receiving first-generation disease-modifying treatments (N = 6 studies) and 0.71% (95% CI = -0.81% to -0.61%) in untreated study arms (N = 6 studies). Conclusions: In this study, the average multiple sclerosis patient receiving first-generation disease-modifying treatment or no disease-modifying treatment lost approximately 0.7% of brain volume/year, well above rates associated with normal aging (0.1%-03% of brain volume/year). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据