4.5 Article

Studies of ion solvation and ion association of n-tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate and n-tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate in various solvents

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 277, 期 1, 页码 20-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2008.11.004

关键词

Association constant; Ion mobility; Limiting molar conductivity; Stokes' radius; Solvation number; n-Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate; n-Tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conductometric investigation of n-tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (NBu(4)PF(6)) was performed in methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), 2-propanol (2-PrOH), acetone (ACE), 3-pentanone (PEN), tetrahydrofurane (THF), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dichloromethane (DCM). acetonitrile (ACN) and N-methylformamide (NMF) at 298.15 K. The limiting molar conductivities (A(o)) and the association constants (K(A)) were derived from the Lee-Wheaton conductivity equation. The limiting ion conductivities (lambda(o)(+/-)) were evaluated using n-tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate (NBu(4)BPh(4)) as a reference electrolyte according to the method of Krumgalz. The Stokes' radii (r(st)) of PF(6)(-) anion were estimated and used for the calculation of its solvation numbers (S(n).) in investigated solvent media. The mobility of ions was found to be completely controlled by the bulk viscosity (eta) and consequently the Walden product (W=eta A(o)) was found to be almost constant. Slight ionic association was found for NBu(4)PF(6) in solvent media with dielectric constant epsilon > 16 while the association becomes more significant in THF which has the lowest dielectric constant (epsilon = 7.5). The S(n) values indicate weak interactions between PF(6)(-) and solvent molecules. The only exception was found in the case of MeOH, in which the great S(n) value can be attributed to a hydrogen bond formation between the fluor atoms of PF(6)(-) and hydrogen of MeOH molecules. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据