4.4 Article

Investigation of Glycerol Atomization in the Near-Field of a Flow-Blurring Injector using Time-Resolved PIV and High-Speed Visualization

期刊

FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 323-338

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-014-9572-2

关键词

Spray and droplet combustion; Fuel atomization; Glycerol; Time-resolved PIV; High-speed flow visualization

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [EE0001733]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycerol has very high kinematic viscosity and high vaporization and auto-ignition temperatures, but it has been effectively atomized at room temperature by using a novel flow blurring (FB) injector and then cleanly combusted without any combustor hardware modification. The present study qualitatively and quantitatively reveals the details of glycerol atomization in the near field of the FB injector. Time-resolved Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) with exposure time of 150 ns and image pair acquisition rate of 15 kHz is utilized to probe the glycerol spray at spatial resolution of 16.83 A mu m per pixel. PIV results describe the droplet dynamics in terms of instantaneous, mean, and root-mean-square (RMS) profiles of the axial velocity. In addition, high-speed imaging (75 kHz) coupled with backside lighting is applied to reveal the glycerol breakup process at spatial resolution of 7.16 A mu m per pixel and exposure time of 1 A mu s. Results indicate that the primary breakup by FB atomization or bubble explosions occurs inside the injector and it results in ligaments and droplets at the injector exit. Then, the secondary breakup by Rayleigh-Taylor instability occurs in the near-field of the injector exit where the high-velocity atomizing air stretches the ligaments into thin ligaments that disintegrate into smaller ligaments, and subsequently, into droplets. Thus, within a short distance downstream of the injector exit (< 30 mm), most of the glycerol is atomized into fine droplets demonstrating excellent atomization performance of the FB injector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据