4.3 Article

Consequence of ramet defoliation on plant clonal propagation and biomass allocation: Example of five rhizomatous grassland species

期刊

FLORA
卷 204, 期 1, 页码 25-33

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2007.11.008

关键词

Biomass production; Clipping; Compensatory growth; Performance; Tolerance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of ramet defoliation frequency on clonal propagation and the patterns of biomass production and allocation on five rhizomatous species (Carex divisa Hude., Eleocharis palustris L., Juncus articulatus L., Juncus gerardii Lois. and Elytrigia repens L.). Plants were grown during an 18-week experiment in greenhouse conditions. The above ground parts of ramets were clipped following three treatments: frequent (every 2 weeks), moderate (every 4 weeks) and unclipped (control). The growth of C divisa, J articulatus and E repens was strongly affected by defoliation whereas E palustris and J gerardii maintained a similar performance when defoliated. The latter were able to compensate for the biomass loss even after six consecutive clippings. Defoliation frequency had a significant effect on total biomass production for C divisa, J articulatus and E repens while J gerardii and E. palustris maintained total biomass production. Most of the studied species showed a decrease in clonal traits when defoliated. Clipped plants displayed fewer and shorter rhizomes. Defoliation had a strong influence in biomass production with a decrease in rhizome mass in all clipped species. A greater allocation to aerial parts and a lower to rhizomes were also detected. Moderate defoliation entailed intermediate response in 1/3 of detected significant effects of defoliation on plant traits. Finally, in the experimental conditions, E palustris and J gerardii were the most tolerant species to defoliation, while J articulatus was intermediate and C divisa and E repens had the lowest tolerance. (C) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据