4.6 Article

Thymoquinone vapor significantly affects the results of Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity tests using the standard broth microdilution method

期刊

FITOTERAPIA
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 102-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.01.024

关键词

Essential oil; Microtiter plate; Nigella sativa; Quinone; Staphylococcus aureus; Volatile

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM 6046070901]
  2. European Science Foundation and Ministry of Education
  3. Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0040]
  4. University-wide Internal Grant Agency-CIGA of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague [20125009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The broth microdilution (BMD) method is widely used for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents, including volatile oils and their components. In this series of various experiments, we have demonstrated the influence of thymoquinone (TQ) vapor on the results of the BMD test performed with Staphylococcus aureus as a model organism. The spread of vapor from the TQ containing wells (32-512 mu g/mL) caused the complete inhibition of staphylococcal growth in adjoining wells initially containing bacterium-inoculated pure Mueller-Hinton broth only and thus produced false positive results of the test. The ability of TQ to pass into the adjoined wells was subsequently confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, whereas TQ at concentrations up to 84 mu g/mL was detected in these wells after five hours. Based on these results, we suppose that vapors of TQ as well as of other naturally occurring volatile compounds and their mixtures (for example essential oils and plant extracts) can significantly influence results of the standard BMD assay. These observations, therefore, call for development of new appropriate BMD method suitable for assessment of antimicrobial activity of volatile substances. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据