4.3 Article

Impacts of the 2011 mega-earthquake and tsunami on abalone Haliotis discus hannai and sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus populations at Oshika Peninsula, Miyagi, Japan

期刊

FISHERIES OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 113-120

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/fog.12008

关键词

benthic community; marine invertebrates; mortality; physical disturbance

资金

  1. Development Projects for Application in Promoting New Policy of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries Japan [2024]
  2. Coastal Ecosystem Complex of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On 11 March 2011, a massive tsunami generated by a mega-earthquake with a moment magnitude of 9.0 hit a wide area of Pacific coast of northeast Japan. We observed and analyzed the effects of the earthquake and tsunami event on populations of the abalone Haliotis discus hannai and sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus at Tomarihama in Miyagi, where we have carried out regular surveys since January 2008. Before the event, algal forests dominated by the brown macroalga Eisenia bicyclis had developed in the survey area shallower than 5m in depth, where adult abalone >50mm in shell length (SL) inhabited. Juvenile abalone <20mm SL and juvenile and adult urchins inhabited the deeper area dominated by crustose coralline algae (CCA). After the event, although no apparent decrease was observed in the brown macroalgal population, the mean density of adult abalone >50mm SL, mainly inhabiting the algal forests, was reduced by more than half. The impact of the tsunami was more profound in the CCA area than in the macroalgal forest. Juvenile abalone and urchins largely decreased to 14 and 5% of the densities just before the event, respectively. The distribution pattern of juvenile abalone and urchins could be a cause of the marked decrease, because most of these animals inhabited the CCA area where the disturbance by the massive water movement was not reduced by the effects of the macroalgal forest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据