4.7 Article

Comparative skin mucus and serum humoral defence mechanisms in the teleost gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 545-551

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.01.001

关键词

Skin mucus; Mucosal immunity; Humoral immunity; Bactericidal activity; Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata)

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2011-30381-C03-01]
  2. Fundacion Seneca de la Region de Murcia (Grupo de Excelencia) [04538/GERM/06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucosal surfaces of fish, including skin, gill and gut, contain numerous immune substances poorly studied that act as the first line of defence against a broad spectrum of pathogens. This study aimed to identify and characterize for the first time different constitutive humoral defence mechanisms of the skin mucus of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). To do this, the levels of total immunoglobulin M, several enzymes and proteins (peroxidase, lysozyme, alkaline phosphatase, esterases, proteases and anti-proteases), as well as the bactericidal activity against opportunist fish pathogens (Vibrio hanrveyi, Vibrio angillarum, Photobacterium damselae) and non-pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis) were measured in the skin mucus and compared with those found in the serum. This study demonstrates that gilthead seabream skin mucus contains lower levels of IgM, similar levels of lysozyme, alkaline phosphatase and proteases, and higher esterase, peroxidase and antiprotease activities than serum. In addition, skin mucus revealed stronger bactericidal activity against tested fish pathogen bacteria compared to the serum activity, while human bacteria can even grow more in the presence of mucus. The results could be useful for better understanding the role of the skin mucus as a key component of the innate immune system with potential application for the aquaculture. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据