4.5 Article

Travelling fires for structural design-Part II: Design methodology

期刊

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 96-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.011

关键词

Travelling fires; Structural engineering; Design fires; Building fire safety

资金

  1. RAEng/Leverhulme Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Close inspection of accidental fires in large, open-plan compartments reveals that they do not burn simultaneously throughout the whole enclosure. Instead, these fires tend to move across floor plates as flames spread, burning over a limited area at any one time. These fires have been labelled travelling fires. Current structural fire design methods do not account for these types of fires. Despite these observations, fire scenarios most commonly used for the structural design of modern buildings are based on traditional methods that assume uniform burning and homogenous temperature conditions throughout a compartment, regardless of its size. This paper is Part II of a two part article and gives details of a new design methodology using travelling fires to produce more realistic fire scenarios in large, open-plan compartments than the conventional methods that assume uniform burning. The methodology considers a range of possible fire sizes and is aimed at producing results consistent with the requirements of structural fire analysis. The methodology is applied to a case study of a generic concrete frame by means of heat transfer calculations to infer structural performance. It is found that fires that are around 10% of the floor area are the most onerous for the structure, producing rebar temperatures equivalent to those reached from exposure to 106 min of the standard fire and approximately 200 degrees C hotter than that calculated using the Eurocode 1 parametric temperature-time curve. A detailed sensitivity analysis is presented, concluding that the most sensitive input parameters are related to the building design and its use and not the physical assumptions or numerical implementation of the method. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据