4.2 Article

Sodium-based fire resistant geopolymer for passive fire protection

期刊

FIRE AND MATERIALS
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 259-270

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fam.2244

关键词

geopolymer; FeNi slag; fire resistant; passive fire protection

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund, ESF)
  2. Greek national fund through the Operational Program 'Education and Lifelong Learning' of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)
  3. Greek national fund through the Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper primarily deals with the examination of the performance under thermal loading of a fire resistant sodium-based geopolymer from Ferronickel slag. In addition, the mechanical, physical and thermal properties of material and their respective variation with time were measured. It is shown that the material presents good mechanical strength and excellent physical and thermal properties. The behaviour of the material on fire was tested by subjecting it to thermal loading with the modification of a standardized passive fire protection test. Two different fire scenarios were investigated: (1) the least intensive standard ISO 834 fire load curve and (2) the most severe Rijkswaterstaat fire load curve. The material behaviour was excellent under its exposure at the ISO 834 fire load curve, showing optimal thermal insulating function and very good structural integrity. Under the Rijkswaterstaat fire load curve, the material showed again a very good thermal insulating function while at the same time suffered from creeping phenomena at the extremely high temperature of 1300 degrees C that affected drastically its structural integrity. As a conclusion, the sodium-based geopolymer from FeNi slag may be an appropriate material for passive fire protection systems under cellulosic fires but inappropriate against more intense fire incidents. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据