4.7 Article

Crop yield response to soil fertility and N, P, K inputs in different environments: Testing and improving the QUEFTS model

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 35-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.005

关键词

QUEFFS; Phosphorus; Nitrogen; Potassium; Crop production; Global scale

类别

资金

  1. Wageningen UR (Animal and Plant Science groups and PE&RC graduate school)
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00005189] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00005189] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global food production strongly depends on availability of nutrients. Assessment of future global phosphorus (P) fertilizer demand in interaction with nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilizers under different levels of food demand requires a model-based approach. In this paper we tested use of the QUEFTS model (Quantitative Evaluation of Fertility of Tropical Soils) for assessing crop yields in response to N, P and K application in different environments. QUEFTS was initially developed to simulate interactions between N, P and K for tropical soils under maize crop. We performed an extensive model analysis of crop yields in relation to soil and fertilizer nutrients for six field data sets with maize, rice, and wheat crops grown in tropical and temperate regions. The model equations had to be adapted to broaden the model applicability beyond the original boundary conditions of pH, rain-fed cropping systems, optimum harvest index and temperature. Recalibration and modification resulted in a good agreement between model predicted and observed yields. Our results indicate that the adjustments increased the applicability of the model. However, for application in global studies QUEFTS is data demanding and, also, further testing (and probably improvement) is needed, since various processes (e.g. inputs of other nutrients than N, P and K, sub-soil properties and water supply) are ignored in the model, but may differ dramatically across the globe. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据