4.7 Article

Characterization of the plant traits contributed to high grain yield and high grain nitrogen concentration in maize

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.01.002

关键词

Grain nitrogen concentration; Stay green; PNUE; Photosynthetic rate; N remobilization efficiency; N uptake

类别

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2011CB100305]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31272233, 31121062]
  3. Special Fund for the Agricultural Profession [201103003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the past several decades, maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield (GY) has increased dramatically, while grain nitrogen concentration (GNC) has declined in modern hybrids. Genetic improvement to increase both high GY and GNC is necessary to improve maize nutritional quality. In the present study, we characterized the plant traits in three maize cultivars (YD13, ZD958, XY335) with contrasting GY and GNC in a two-year field experiment in two soils (Fu-jia-jie with infertile sandy soil and Quan-yan-gou with fertile clay soil). The hybrid YD13 as a control had low yield and high GNC. In comparison to YD13, ZD958 had higher GY but lower GNC, whereas XY335 had higher GY and similar GNC. Both ZD958 and XY335 had higher total and post-silking dry matter (DM) accumulation and N uptake than YD13, and were also characterized by delayed leaf senescence and a sustained net photosynthetic rate after silking. In addition, XY335 also had higher N remobilization efficiency (NRE) and higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) than ZD958. It is supposed that higher NRE together with higher N and DM accumulation are the target traits to improve the modern stay-green cultivars to increase GNC without penalty in GY in the area of northeast China. Increasing PNUE of the leaves may be a possible way to maintain whole-plant photosynthesis and DM accumulation under efficient N remobilization. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据