4.7 Article

Bread and durum wheat yields under a wide range of environmental conditions

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 258-271

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.008

关键词

Triticum; Yield components; Yield stability; Breeding; NUE; WUE

类别

资金

  1. WatNitMED, a Project of the European Union
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2006-07814/AGR]
  3. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is frequently assumed that durum wheat is more tolerant to stress than bread wheat. Unfortunately few research papers compare the performance of both species side-by-side under a wide range of environments in field conditions. We aimed to compare durum and bread wheat performance in a field study under contrasting treatments of water and nitrogen during three experimental seasons. In addition we compiled a comprehensive database with data from field experiments in which both species were grown in the same field conditions. A cross-over interaction of yield from bread vs. durum wheat was found, but oppositely to the hypothesis, bread outyielded durum wheat in the low-yielding conditions while durum wheat tended to have higher potential yield. We then divided the database in decades in which the cultivars were released and found that in the 1960s bread wheat outyielded durum wheat in almost any comparison whilst in the 2000s durum wheat outyielded bread wheat in most comparisons. Grain weight was constitutively higher in durum than in bread wheat, likely associated with a lower fruiting efficiency in the former; but in both types of wheat grain number per m(2) was the component responsible for yield sensitivity to environmental changes. Differences in yield were also related to differences in water and nitrogen use efficiencies: under low-yielding conditions bread wheat was consistently more efficient than durum wheat and under high-yielding conditions durum wheat was more efficient. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据