4.7 Article

Breeding low-glycemic index barley for functional food

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 31-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.07.018

关键词

Barley; beta glucan; Functional food; Glycemic index; QTL; Yield

类别

资金

  1. Welsh Government
  2. HGCA
  3. Biosciences, Agriculture and Environment Alliance (BEAA)
  4. Cotton Section, Agriculture Research Institute Tando Jam, Sind, Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low glycemic index (GI) grains with high levels of 13 glucan soluble fibre are beneficial for health. Naked barley (Hordeum vulgare L) cultivars generally have higher grain p glucan contents than hulled barley, but lower yields. Naked grain requires no pearling or processing for use in wholegrain health foods and it is widely recognised that consumption of wholegrain barley is beneficial for health. Nearly all commercially available UK barley cultivars are hulled and have been bred for low (<3%) beta-glucan content for malting. In this study a large segregating population was made from crosses between diverse naked and hulled parents. Selections were made for naked barley lines with adaptation to UK cultivation that were >= 65% genetically similar to UK hulled barley. In a mapping population beta-glucan contents ranged from 1.4% to 8.6% with transgressive segregation occurring in both directions and no significant association of beta-glucan content with the gene for naked caryopsis (nud). A QTL explaining 31% of the inheritance of 13 glucan was detected on 7HL, approximately 15 cM above mid, and CslF6 is the most likely candidate gene. QTLs that can increase beta-glucan content and yield components that are not linked to hull type (nud) and row type (vrs1) can now be targeted to produce higher yielding functional food barley. Porridges made with selected naked barley and naked oats were tested for Gland the naked barley had significantly lower GI than oats, demonstrating that they can be incorporated in the diet as a functional food. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据