4.7 Article

Physiological strategies for seed number determination in soybean: Biomass accumulation, partitioning and seed set efficiency

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 58-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.012

关键词

Crop physiology; Reproductive partitioning; Seed set efficiency; Ideotype breeding

类别

资金

  1. Iowa Soybean Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is evidence that soybean yield needs to increase at faster rates to satisfy a growing demand. Because yield is mostly determined by the number of harvested seeds, we used a seed number determination framework for phenotyping a large set of cultivars. This framework incorporates biomass accumulation during the seed set period, biomass partitioning to reproductive structures and seed set efficiency per unit of accumulated reproductive biomass. Our objectives were: (i) identify clusters of cultivars differing in seed number across environments, (ii) describe average differences among clusters for the parameters that determine seed number, (iii) evaluate parameter variation within the highest yielding clusters. Objectives were independently tested at central USA and central Argentina (ARC) using cultivars from each region (61 at USA and 25 at ARC). Clusters differing in seed number across environments were identified. Seed number was associated with rapid growth rates (USA only), increased partitioning and greater seed set efficiency. In spite of these differences between clusters, there was significant residual variation among genotypes within highest yielding clusters for most physiological parameters. Our study provided evidence there is no unique physiological pathway for achieving high yields in either environment. This indicated developing targeted segregating populations using high yielding parents with contrasting physiological strategies is feasible. It provides an opportunity for testing yield increases using ideotype construction by pyramiding desirable physiological parameters. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据