4.7 Article

Scale and spatial structure effects on the outcome of barley cultivar mixture trials for disease control

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 74-79

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.002

关键词

Diversity; Blends; Epidemiology; Powdery mildew; Blumeria graminis f.sp hordei

类别

资金

  1. SCRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of field-trial scale, including plot size, and its interaction with fertiliser level and barley germplasm on mixture efficacy in controlling powdery mildew were investigated. Two groups of cultivars, one from cultivars grown in the UK and the other from cultivars grown in Poland, along with all their respective three-component mixtures, were grown in three field trials, one with 13.5 m(2) plots, one with 0.4m(2) plots, and the third in intermediate size plots, which included a mixture of all the cultivars in both groups in equal size treatments of structured spatial arrangements. Another trial utilised similar structured spatial arrangements to trial 3 was carried out using a combination of cultivars with appropriate matching virulence levels (trial 4). Mixtures showed either a reduction in powdery mildew infection compared with the component monoculture mean, or no significant effect. There was a trend towards greater reductions at the low fertiliser level and smaller plot size. The most structured spatial arrangement was most effective for reducing infection in trials 3 and 4, but the complex-homogeneous arrangement in the fourth trial was also effective. Rhynchosporium was reduced by a similar and substantial amount by both spatial treatments in trial 3. The plot size and structuring effects may be explained by the interaction between host heterogeneity structure and pathogen dispersal scale effects, but resource exploitation for yield was best in the complex-homogeneous arrangement in trial 3 where all components were present to respond directly. These findings have implications for methods of trialling mixtures for large-scale field use and for testing component combining ability. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据