4.7 Article

Canopy temperature on clear and cloudy days can be used to estimate varietal differences in stomatal conductance in rice

期刊

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 165-170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.019

关键词

Canopy temperature difference (CTd); Infrared thermography; Photosynthesis; Rice; Stomatal conductance (g(s))

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan [QTL1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf photosynthetic potential, a major determinant of yield potential in rice, is mostly explained by stomatal conductance (g(s)) as well as leaf N content (Rubisco protein content). Therefore, the rapid and precise evaluation of g(s) as well as leaf N content would be a valuable addition to rice breeding programs aimed at improved yield potential. We established a simple method based on infrared thermography to estimate varietal differences in g(s). Seven rice varieties were cultivated in two-row plots in 2007, and canopy temperatures in three varieties, including a control variety, Koshihikari, were simultaneously measured to determine canopy temperature difference (CTd) between Koshihikari and the other varieties on clear days. The varieties Takanari, Habataki, and TUAT1-5-6a displayed significantly (P < 0.05) lower leaf temperature and higher g(s) and leaf photosynthetic rate (P-n) than Koshihikari. CTd was closely correlated with g(s) and P-n. These results indicate that CTd may be useful as a relative index to estimate varietal differences in g(s). A significant CTd was still observed even under cloudy conditions in 2008. Takanari and TUAT1-5-6a had lower leaf temperature than Koshihikari on cloudy days as well as on clear days. Subsequent investigation of photosynthetic light response curves revealed that Takanari and TUAT1-5-6a had higher g(s) and P-n than Koshihikari under lower irradiance. These results suggest that infrared thermography may be a simple method of evaluating varietal differences in g(s) through CTd, and that it may be practicable even under cloudy conditions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据