4.7 Article

Blastocysts can be rebiopsied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 102, 期 6, 页码 1641-1645

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.018

关键词

Test-failure; blastocyst; biopsy; vitrification; SNP array

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2012CB944901]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [81222007]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of re-examining the test-failure blastocysts in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening cycles. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University-affiliated center. Patient(s): Women with test-failure blastocysts cryopreserved in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening cycles. Intervention(s): Cryopreserved test-failure blastocysts were warmed and underwent a second round of biopsy, single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis, and vitrification, and the normal blastocysts were warmed again for ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): The percentage of test-failure blastocysts for transfer, the implantation rate per transferred blastocyst, and the live birth rate. Result(s): A total of 106 test-failure blastocysts from 77 cycles were warmed for re-examination. A total of 73 blastocysts that completely expanded were considered to have survived the warming process and were successfully rebiopsied. After single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis, 70 blastocysts yielded whole genome amplification product, and 31 had normal chromosomes (44.3%). A total of 19 normal blastocysts were warmed for ET, of which 18 survived and were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate (implantation rate) was 50.0% in 10 single blastocyst transfer cycles, and all the implanted blastocysts resulted in healthy live births. Conclusion(s): Test-failure blastocysts that survived from the first warming procedure can tolerate a second round of biopsy, vitrification, and warming, have a high chance of having normal chromosomes, and are worth being re-examined. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据