4.7 Article

Examining the temperature of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial comparing traditional core temperature (37°C) to a more physiologic, cooler temperature (36°C)

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 102, 期 3, 页码 767-773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.009

关键词

Culture temperature; embryo development; human embryo culture; in vitro fertilization

资金

  1. RMAPA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether culture at a more physiologically cooler temperature, as suggested by limited human and animal data, would improve blastulation and pregnancy rates in human clinical IVF. Design: Paired randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic. Patient(s): Infertile couples (n = 52) with a female partner less than 42 years old with eight or more mature oocytes retrieved. Intervention(s): Mature oocytes obtained from a single cohort of oocytes were randomly divided into two groups; one was cultured at 37 degrees C and the other at 36 degrees C from the time of ICSI to the time of embryo transfer or vitrification. Paired embryo transfers were accomplished by transferring one euploid embryo from each group. DNA fingerprinting was used as needed to determine the outcome for each embryo. Main Outcome Measure(s): Rate of development of expanded blastocysts suitable for transfer or vitrification (primary outcome), fertilization, aneuploidy, and sustained implantation. Result(s): A total of 805 mature oocytes were cultured; 399 at 36 degrees C and 406 at 37 degrees C. Paired analysis demonstrated a higher rate of usable blastocyst formation per zygote at 37 degrees C (48.4%) vs. at 36 degrees C (41.2%). Rates of fertilization, aneuploidy, and sustained implantation were equivalent. Conclusion(s): IVF culture at 36 degrees C does not improve clinically relevant parameters of embryo development or sustained implantation rates. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据