4.7 Article

Assisted reproduction policies in Israel: a retrospective analysis of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.740

关键词

Assisted reproductive technologies; IVF; health policy; health care allocation; culture of perseverance

资金

  1. Israel National Institute for Policy Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze whether the results and effectiveness of the open-ended treatment with IVF in Israel justifies the policy of limitless nondonor IVF rounds. Design: The research sample included 535 patients. The files of these patients were reviewed; data were extracted into a questionnaire, transferred into digital files, and analyzed with SPSS. Setting: IVF clinics. Patient(s): Two hundred ten women who began IVF treatment in 2000 and 325 women who were in IVF treatment during 2010. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Retrospective analysis of the success rates of live births resulting from cycles with IVF in women who started treatment in 2000, retrospective analysis of IVF results during 2010, and number of cycles in women who were in IVF treatment during 2010. Result(s): In the 2000 cohort, the rate of success with IVF was 54%. The success rate fell as the number of unsuccessful cycles and duration of infertility increased; age at the beginning of the treatment was influential. A similar pattern appeared in the group that was in treatment during 2010. The rate of success in the group that was in IVF treatment during 2010 was 16.6%; of the women in this group (2010, ongoing), 25% had already undergone more than five cycles and 12% of the women had already undergone more than seven cycles. Conclusion(s): Although limited in scope, this study suggests that the policy of limitless nondonor IVF-ET cycles in Israel should be further examined and assessed. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据