4.7 Article

Ovarian reserve and subsequent assisted reproduction outcomes after methotrexate therapy for ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 413-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.027

关键词

ART; ectopic; methotrexate; ovarian stimulation; pregnancy of unknown location; salpingectomy

资金

  1. Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess ovarian reserve after methotrexate treatment for ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location after assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large ART practice. Patient(s): Women receiving methotrexate or surgery after ART. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), antral follicle count (AFC), and oocyte yield compared between women treated with methotrexate or surgery, with secondary outcomes of clinical pregnancy and live birth. Result(s): There were 153 patients in the methotrexate group and 36 patients in the surgery group. Neither group demonstrated differences in ovarian reserve or oocyte yield in a comparison of the before and after treatment values. The change in ovarian reserve and oocyte yield after treatment were similar between the two groups. The number of doses of methotrexate was not correlated with changes in ovarian reserve, indicating no dose-dependent effect. Time between treatment and repeat ART was not correlated with outcomes. Live birth in subsequent cycles was similar in the two groups. Conclusion(s): Ovarian reserve and subsequent ART cycle outcomes were reassuring after methotrexate or surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. No adverse impact of methotrexate was detected in this large fertility cohort as has been previously described elsewhere. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据