4.7 Article

The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 818-824

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004

关键词

Endometrial receptivity; repeated implantation failure; prediction tool; ERA test; customized microarray; personalized embryo transfer

资金

  1. EU [324509]
  2. Fundacion IVI
  3. Iviomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To demonstrate the clinical value of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF), for guiding their personalized embryo transfer (pET) as a novel therapeutic strategy. Design: Prospective interventional multicenter clinical trial. Setting: University-affiliated infertility and private clinics. Patient(s): Eighty-five RIF patients and 25 comparison patients. Intervention(s): Endometrial sampling and pET guided by ERA. Main Outcome Measure(s): A receptive (R) or nonreceptive (NR) endometrial status according to ERA. Pregnancy (PR) and implantation (IR) rates after pET. Result(s): The ERA test gave an R result of 74.1% in RIF patients versus 88% in control subjects. Clinical follow-up was possible in 29 RIF patients, in whom pET was performed, resulting in 51.7% PR and 33.9% IR. The IRs and PRs in the 6 months after the biopsy showed that pregnancy was not related to the local injury. Twenty-two RIF patients (25.9%) were NR, and in 15 of them a second ERA validated a displacement of the window of implantation (WOI). In eight of them, pET was performed on the day designated by the ERA, resulting in 50.0% PR and 38.5% IR. These results should be considered as preliminary. Conclusion(s): There is an increased percentage of WOI displacement in RIF patients compared with comparison group patients, leading to the concept of pET as a therapeutic strategy. Rescue of NR patients by pET in a displaced WOI results in similar PR and IR. ((C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据