4.7 Article

Semen cryopreservation for men banking for oligospermia, cancers, and other pathologies: prediction of post-thaw outcome using basal semen quality

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1555-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.005

关键词

Sperm cryopreservation; sperm motility; oligospermia; cancer; sperm viability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate post-thawing sperm parameters in a large series of men cryopreserving for different cancers and oligospermia. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Semen cryopreservation laboratory. Patient(s): Six hundred twenty-three patients undergoing semen cryopreservation for cancer or oligospermia who discontinued banking. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Postcryopreservation sperm motility and viability. Result(s): In oligospermic men, recovery of motile sperm after cryopreservation was possible in only a few out of the 219 samples cryopreserved for this problem. Similarly, independent of the reason for which cryopreservation was required, if one basal semen parameter fell below the 5th percentile of the World Health Organization reference values, recovery of motile and viable spermatozoa after thawing was low. Among samples cryopreserved for cancer, those with testicular cancer showed the lowest basal semen quality and recovery after thawing. In cases of hematological cancers or other types of cancers, motility recovery was similar to that of non-cancer-related samples. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrate that basal progressive and total motility predict the recovery rate of motile sperm after thawing with high accuracy, sensibility and specificity. Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrates the ability of prefreeze semen parameters to predict cryosurvival in terms of sensitivity and precision. Using this information, the clinician could perform appropriate counseling about the future possibilities of fertility for the patient. (C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据