4.7 Article

In vitro maturation or in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries? A case-control study of 194 treatment cycles

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 355-360

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.046

关键词

In vitro maturation (IVM); in vitro fertilization (IVF); polycystic ovaries (PCO); ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the outcome of unstimulated in vitro maturation (IVM) and routine IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for women with polycystic ovaries (PCO). Design: Retrospective case-control study. Setting: Fertility unit. Patient(s): Ninety-seven patients undergoing IVM were compared with 97 patients undergoing IVF. All had PCO and matched for age, infertility diagnosis, and ovulatory status. Intervention(s): In vitro maturation cycles were unstimulated and hCG was administered 35-40 hours before oocyte retrieval. Oocytes were matured in vitro for 24-48 hours before insemination by ICSI. Endometrial priming with E-2 and P was commenced from the day of egg retrieval and one to two embryos were transferred on days 2-5 of development. Standard long protocol IVF/ICSI was used in the control group. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth rate per cycle and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. Result(s): Overall, 65% of IVM eggs matured in vitro in the IVM group. Implantation rates were significantly higher in the IVF group (19.4% vs. 12.9%) as clinical pregnancy rates (50.5% vs. 19.6%) and live birth rates (44.3% vs. 16.5%) than in the IVM group. The OHSS rate was significantly higher in the IVF group (8.2% vs. 0%). Conclusion(s): In vitro maturation is a safer and simpler alternative to conventional IVF for women with PCO. It avoids difficulties of gonadotropin stimulation and the risk of OHSS but has a significantly lower live birth rate. Current research projects aim to close the success gap between IVM and IVF. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98: 355-60. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据