4.7 Article

Are increased levels of self-reported psychosocial stress, anxiety, and depression associated with fecundity?

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 453-458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.018

关键词

Fertility; stress; anxiety; depression; social support

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  2. UK National Health Service Executive Primary Care Career Scientist and Service Research and Development Awards
  3. DLM Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the association between self-reported measures of stress, anxiety, depression, and related constructs and fecundity. Design: Prospective cohort study of women trying to conceive. Setting: United Kingdom. Patient(s): Three hundred thirty-nine women aged 18-40 years who were attempting to conceive. Intervention(s): Completed daily diaries for up to six cycles or until pregnancy was detected. For each cycle, stress biomarkers were measured and psychosocial questionnaires were completed. Main Outcome Measures(s): Fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using discrete time survival methods, and the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy were calculated using Bayesian statistical techniques. Result(s): Among the 339 women, 207 (61%) became pregnant during the study, 69 (20%) did not become pregnant, and 63 (19%) withdrew. After controlling for maternal age, parity, months trying to conceive before enrollment, smoking, caffeine use, and frequency of intercourse, we found no association between most psychosocial measures and FORs or the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy save for an increased FOR for women reporting higher versus lower levels of social support. Conclusion(s): Self-reported psychosocial stress, anxiety, and depression were not associated with fecundity. Any adverse effect of stress or psychological disturbance on fecundity does not appear to be detectable via the questionnaires administered. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:453-8. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据