4.7 Article

Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 360-365

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087

关键词

Endometriosis; epidemiology; histology; incidence; laparoscopy; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health [NO1-DK-6-3428, NO1-DK-6-3427, 10001406-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To estimate the incidence of endometriosis in an operative cohort of women seeking clinical care and in a matched population cohort to delineate more fully the scope and magnitude of endometriosis in the context of and beyond clinical care. Design: Matched-exposure cohort design. Setting: Surgical centers in the Salt Lake City, Utah, and San Francisco, California, areas. Patient(s): The operative cohort comprised 495 women undergoing laparoscopy/laparotomy between 2007 and 2009, and the population cohort comprised 131 women from the surgical centers' catchment areas. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Incidence of endometriosis by diagnostic method in the operative cohort and by pelvic magnetic resonance imaged (MRI) disease in the population cohort. Result(s): Endometriosis incidence in the operative cohort ranged by two orders of magnitude by diagnostic method: 0.7% for only histology, 7% for only MRI, and 41% for visualized disease. Endometriosis staging was skewed toward minimal (58%) and mild disease (15%). The incidence of MRI-diagnosed endometriosis was 11% in the population cohort. Conclusion(s): Endometriosis incidence is dependent on the diagnostic method and choice of sampling framework. Conservatively, 11% of women have undiagnosed endometriosis at the population level, with implications for the design and interpretation of etiologic research. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 96: 360-5. (c) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据