4.7 Article

Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 366-U431

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090

关键词

Endometriosis; quality of life; work productivity

资金

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma (BSP)
  2. WERF
  3. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the impact of endometriosis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity. Design: Multicenter cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment. Setting: Sixteen clinical centers in ten countries. Patient(s): A total of 1,418 premenopausal women, aged 18-45 years, without a previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis, having laparoscopy to investigate symptoms or to be sterilized. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Diagnostic delay, HRQoL, and work productivity. Result(s): There was a delay of 6.7 years, principally in primary care, between onset of symptoms and a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis, which was longer in centers where women received predominantly state-funded health care (8.3 vs. 5.5 years). Delay was positively associated with the number of pelvic symptoms (chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and heavy periods) and a higher body mass index. Physical HRQoL was significantly reduced in affected women compared with those with similar symptoms and no endometriosis. Each affected woman lost on average 10.8 hours (SD 12.2) of work weekly, mainly owing to reduced effectiveness while working. Loss of work productivity translated into significant costs per woman/week, from US$4 in Nigeria to US$456 in Italy. Conclusion(s): Endometriosis impairs HRQoL and work productivity across countries and ethnicities, yet women continue to experience diagnostic delays in primary care. A higher index of suspicion is needed to expedite specialist assessment of symptomatic women. Future research should seek to clarify pain mechanisms in relation to endometriosis severity. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 96: 366-73. (c) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据