4.7 Article

Embryonic imprinting perturbations do not originate from superovulation-induced defects in DNA methylation acquisition

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 734-U268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.055

关键词

Superovulation; oocyte; genomic imprinting; DNA methylation; assisted reproductive technologies

资金

  1. University of Western Ontario, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  2. Ministry of Research and Innovation [ER06-02-188]
  3. Ontario Women's Health Council/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Gender and Health
  4. CIHR
  5. Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduate Research Scholarship
  6. Early Development and the Impact on Health Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether superovulation disrupts maternal imprint acquisition in oocytes. Design: Animal model. Setting: Academic institute. Animal(s): Spontaneously ovulated and superovulated mice. Intervention(s): Low and high hormone dosage treatments were administered to females, and ovulated metaphase II oocytes were collected. Main Outcome Measure(s): Imprinted DNA methylation was analyzed at Snrpn, Kcnq1ot1, Peg3, and H19 in individual oocytes. Result(s): Examination of 125 individual oocytes derived from females subjected to low and high hormone treatments revealed normal imprinted methylation patterns that were comparable to oocytes derived from spontaneously ovulated females. Conclusion(s): Maternal imprint acquisition was not affected by superovulation. Given its aberrant effects during preimplantation development, superovulation must instead disrupt maternal-effect gene products that are required after fertilization for imprint maintenance. These results eliminate imprint acquisition per se as the initial stage of imprint loss and point to the importance of analyses on early embryos after procedures involving oocyte manipulation. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;96:734-8. (c) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据