4.7 Article

Breast cancer and fertility preservation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 1535-1543

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.003

关键词

Breast cancer; fertility preservation; embryo cryopreservation; oocyte cryopreservation; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; ovarian transplantation; GnRH agonist; chemotherapy; cancer survivorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review the benefits of adjuvant systemic therapy given to women with breast cancer of reproductive age, its effects on fertility, and options for fertility preservation. Design: Publications relevant to fertility preservation and breast cancer were identified through a PubMed database search. Conclusion(s): Most women who develop invasive breast cancer under age 40 will be advised to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy with or without extended antihormonal therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy particularly with alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide is gonadotoxic and markedly accelerates the rate of age-related ovarian follicle loss. Although loss of fertility is an important issue for young cancer survivors, there is often little discussion about fertility preservation before initiation of adjuvant therapy. Greater familiarity with prognosis and effects of different types of adjuvant therapy on the part of infertility specialists and fertility preservation options such cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes, and ovarian tissue on the part of oncologists would facilitate these discussions. Establishment of rapid fertility consultation links within cancer survivorship programs can help ensure that every young woman who is likely to undergo gonadotoxic cancer treatment is counseled about the effects of therapy and options available to her to increase the likelihood of childbearing after cancer treatment. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 95: 1535-43. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据