4.7 Article

Human chorionic gonadotropin confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in decidualizing human endometrial stromal cells

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 1302-1307

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.048

关键词

Decidualization; hCG; FOXO1; SOD2; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture [20591928]
  2. Yamaguchi Endocrine Research Association, Tokyo, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592412, 20591928] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the effect of hCG on the expression of genes involved in oxidative stress resistance observed in decidualizing human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs). Design: In vitro experiment. Setting: Saitama Medical University hospital. Patient(s): Premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for myoma uteri. Intervention(s): HESCs from hysterectomy specimens were isolated and incubated with 8-bromo-cyclic adenosine monophosphate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the presence or absence of recombinant hCG (rhCG) at various concentrations. Hydrogen peroxide was used as the source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Main Outcome Measure(s): Apoptotic cells, FOXO1, superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), Bax, and Bcl-2 protein expression. Result(s): In a dose-dependent manner, rhCG conferred additional protection to decidualizing HESCs against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. In parallel, rhCG augmented the expression of the forkhead transcription factor FOXO1 and its downstream target, the ROS scavenger SOD2. rhCG also inhibited the expression of the proapoptotic Bax protein and up-regulated antiapoptotic Bcl-2 levels in decidualizing HESCs exposed to ROS. Conclusion(s): The data suggest that hCG might improve the uterine environment upon implantation by suppressing apoptotic responses in the maternal decidua under oxidative stress. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;95:1302-7. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据