4.7 Article

Random anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a predictor of ovarian response in women with elevated baseline early follicular follicle-stimulating hormone levels

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 7, 页码 2369-2372

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.071

关键词

Anti-Mullerian hormone; ART; Mullerian inhibiting substance; diminished ovarian reserve; elevated FSH levels; ovarian response

资金

  1. UMDNJ/MGH
  2. Beckman Coulter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the utility of random anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in assessing ovarian response among women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) diagnosed by elevated early follicular-phase FSH levels. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Academic and academically affiliated assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs. Patient(s): Seventy-three women undergoing ART with elevated early follicular FSH levels. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes retrieved during ART cycle, number of day 3 embryos, and cycle cancellation and clinical pregnancy rates. Result(s): Random AMH levels were strongly correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved during an ART cycle among women with elevated FSH (r = 0.55). Women with elevated FSH who had a random serum AMH level of 0.6 ng/mL or higher had twice the number of oocytes retrieved (11 +/- 1.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.6), a greater number of day 3 embryos (5.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 3 +/- 0.5), and approximately a third of the cycle cancellation rate (14% vs. 41%) compared with women with a random serum AMH below 0.6 ng/mL. The clinical pregnancy rate was also higher among women with a random serum AMH >= 0.6 ng/mL (28% vs. 14%), however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion(s): A random serum AMH level is useful in setting expectations for ART prognosis in women with elevated early follicular-phase serum FSH levels. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011; 95: 2369-72. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据