4.7 Article

The prevalence of eating disorders in infertile women

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 72-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.055

关键词

Infertility; eating disorders; prevalence; anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; eating disorder not otherwise specified; binge eating disorder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the prevalence of eating disorders in a sample of infertile women. Design: A descriptive comparative two-group design in which collected data were compared with a published community sample. Setting: Private infertility center. Patient(s): Eighty-two participants beginning their first gonadotropin/intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment cycle completed self-report measures that assessed eating disorder pathology and exercise habits. Each subject was telephone-administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) Module H (Eating Disorders) and a. demographic questionnaire. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Past or current diagnosis of an eating disorder. Result(s): Seventeen participants (20.7%) met criteria for a past or current eating disorder, which is five times higher than the U.S. lifetime prevalence rate. None of the participants who met the criteria for an eating disorder had disclosed their past or current diagnosis to their reproductive endocrinologist. Conclusion(s): Infertility clinics are likely to be treating women with a past or current eating disorder history. Therefore, an eating disorder screening tool should be included in the initial intake, because these patients may be at a higher risk for negative maternal and fetal outcomes than non-eating disorder patients. Additionally, patients with a past or current eating disorder may not disclose this information to reproductive health care providers, which may limit providers' ability to provide appropriate medical and psychologic referrals. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;93:72-8. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据