4.7 Article

Long-term oral contraceptive pills and postoperative pain management after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 464-471

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.083

关键词

Postoperative endometriosis-related pain; dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia; chronic pelvic pain; cyclic; continuous oral contraceptives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate postoperative long-term cyclic and continuous administration of combined oral contraceptive (OC) pills in preventing endometriosis-related pain recurrence. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patient(s): Three hundred eleven women who underwent laparoscopic excision for symptomatic ovarian endometrioma. Intervention(s): Patients were randomly divided into three groups: nonuser group receiving no therapy, and cyclic user group and continuous user group receiving low-dose, monophasic OC pills for 24 months in either cyclic or continuous administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Presence and intensity of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain were assessed by a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Result(s): A significant reduction in recurrence rate and VAS scores for dysmenorrhea was evident in the continuous users versus the other groups at 6 months, and in cyclic users versus nonusers at 18 months postoperatively. No significant differences in recurrence rate and VAS scores for dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain were demonstrated among the groups. The increase of VAS scores from 6-24 months during the study period for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain was significantly higher in nonusers than in the other groups. Conclusion(s): Long-term postoperative use of OC pills can reduce the frequency and the severity of recurrent endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea. (Fertil Steril(R) 2010;94:464-71. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据