4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Prevalence of hyperandrogenemia in the polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosed by the National Institutes of Health 1990 criteria

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 93, 期 6, 页码 1938-1941

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.138

关键词

Polycystic ovary syndrome; hyperandrogenemia; total testosterone; free testosterone; dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD29364, K24 HD001346, K24-HD01346-01, R01 HD029364, R01 HD029364-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the prevalence of elevated total and free T, and DHEAS, alone and in combination, in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center. Patient(s): Seven hundred twenty patients diagnosed with PCOS according to the National Institutes of Health 1990 criteria. Intervention(s): History, physical examination, and blood sampling. Main Outcome Measure(s): Hyperandrogenemia, defined as at least one androgen value above the 95th percentile of 98 healthy control women (i.e., total T >88 ng/dL, free T >0.75 ng/dL, and DHEAS >2,750 ng/mL). Result(s): A total of 716 subjects with PCOS were included. The overall prevalence of hyperandrogenemia in PCOS was 75.3%. Supranormal levels of free T were present in 57.6%, of total T in 33.0%, and of DHEAS in 32.7% of patients with PCOS. When assessing the prevalence of two abnormal values, the prevalence of simultaneously elevated androgens was lowest with total T and DHEAS (1.7%) and highest with total T and free T (20.4%). Altogether, simultaneous elevations in all three markers were found in 8.7% of subjects with PCOS. Conclusion(s): Approximately three-fourths of patients with PCOS diagnosed by the National Institutes of Health 1990 criteria have evidence of hyperandrogenemia: the single most predictive assay was the measurement of free T with similar to 60% of patients demonstrating supranormal levels. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;93:1938-41. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据