4.7 Article

Measurement of sperm DNA fragmentation using bright-field microscopy: comparison between sperm chromatin dispersion test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling assay

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 1027-1032

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.034

关键词

Spermatozoa; DNA integrity; in situ nick-end labeling

资金

  1. Foundation of Shandong Provincial Science and Technology Development [2008GG10002046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test with terminal deoxynucleotidyle transferase-mediated terminal uridine nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay in assessing DNA fragmentation in human sperm through bright-field microscopy. Design: Prospectively designed, side-by-side comparative study. Setting: Medical genetics laboratory in a provincial research institution. Patient(s): Sixty male patients presented for infertility evaluation and 30 fertile, volunteer sperm donors. Intervention(s): Semen analysis, SCD test, and TUNEL assay on the same semen sample and on the same spermatozoa. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm DNA fragmentation, determined by SCD test score or TUNEL assay score. Result(s): Sperm chromatin dispersion test and TUNEL assay identified similar proportions of sperm cells with DNA fragmentation in the same semen samples. When the SCD test and TUNEL assay were performed simultaneously on the same spermatozoa, TUNEL-negative sperm showed a large halo, whereas TUNEL-positive sperm showed no halo after Diff-Quik staining. However, in some sperm cells, DNA damage was detected by the SCD test but not by the TUNEL assay. Conclusion(s): Sperm chromatin dispersion test and TUNEL assay are both effective in detecting sperm DNA damage. Using bright-field microscopy, the SCD test appears to be more sensitive than the TUNEL assay. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 1027-32. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据